Skip to main content
rice field banner biometlab logo
   
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 

Field Notes

<--2012-05-21 09:30:00 | 2012-05-31 12:30:00-->
Other sites visited today: Sherman Island | Mayberry | West Pond | DWR Corn

Twitchell Rice: 2012-05-25 13:30:00 (DOY 146)
Author: Joe Verfaillie
Others:

Summary: Collected data, field draining after flash flood, moved radiation boom back out over field.

Twitchell
2012-05-25

I arrived about 1:30PDT. It was cool and breezy with thunderstorms. The field was wet with a few puddles, but draining.

I collected data and images. The plant cam is dead again. I brought in the card but left the plantcam in the field.

The Li7700 RSSI was about 11. After cleaning it was 71. The reservoir was about 2/3 empty. The CH4 concentration was 1.920ppm.

I swung the radiation boom back out over the field.

4 photos found

view of field site
20120525TW_Site.jpg ( 2012-05-25 13:49:35 ) Full size: 4000x3000
view of field site

Draining after flash flood
TW_autocam_20120525_0745.jpg ( 2012-05-25 07:45:02 ) Full size: 1920x1440
Draining after flash flood

Birds, rain, clouds
TW_autocam_20120525_1345.jpg ( 2012-05-25 13:45:02 ) Full size: 1920x1440
Birds, rain, clouds

Nice sunset
TW_autocam_20120525_1915.jpg ( 2012-05-25 19:15:03 ) Full size: 1920x1440
Nice sunset

Graphs display:
6 sets found

12 TW_met graphs found

Soil Heat Flux

Solar Radiation

Air Temperature

Soil Temperature Set 1

Soil Temperature Set 2

Soil Temperature Set 3

Water Temperature

RH and Pressure

Soil Moisture

Rain and Water Level

Disolved Oxygen

LED NDVI Channels

5 TW_flux graphs found

Sonic Anemometer Winds

LI7700 CH4 and RSSI

Twitchell CH4

LI7500 CO2 and H2O

Twitchel Rice Flux Counts

Can't check TWSI_mixed
Can't check SIMBTWEE_met
1 TW_cam graphs found

TW Rice Autocam

Can't check TATWBABCSB_cam

 
 

Login
Select Notes:

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation and US Department of Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporters.