Skip to main content
rice field banner biometlab logo
   
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 

Field Notes

<--2015-05-21 12:15:00 | 2015-06-25 11:45:00-->
Other sites visited today: Twitchell Alfalfa | East End | West Pond | Mayberry

Twitchell Rice: 2015-06-09 13:45:00 (DOY 160)
Author: Joe Verfaillie
Others: Patty, Dennis, Miguel

Summary: Field is flooded, may have been sprayed with herbicide, standard data collection, clip plots

Twitchell
2015-06-09

I arrived about 1:45pm with Dennis, Patty and Miguel. It was warm and overcast with a strong wind from the west. The field has been flooded and some of the weeds look yellowed as if they had been sprayed with herbicide. Near the tower it is still very weedy, but better further out.

The 7700 read: 1.872ppm CH4, 27.6RSSI – 72.4 after cleaning
The 7500 read: 388.3ppm CO2, 764mmol/m3 H2O, 98.5SS, 27.4C, 101.2kPA
The struts of both sensors were dirty and there were some spider webs. The 7500 SS rose to 99.9 after cleaning. The 7700 wash box was about 2/3 empty – filled.

The 7550 clock is about 3min behind – I did not adjust it. The 7700s optics RH was 28%. Maybe we should swap it out with the spare in the lab and change its desiccant next time it needs calibration.

Two of the thermocouples were reading Inf.

Miguel took clip plots.

0 photos found

Graphs display:
6 sets found

12 TW_met graphs found

Soil Heat Flux

Solar Radiation

Air Temperature

Soil Temperature Set 1

Soil Temperature Set 2

Soil Temperature Set 3

Water Temperature

RH and Pressure

Soil Moisture

Rain and Water Level

Disolved Oxygen

LED NDVI Channels

5 TW_flux graphs found

Sonic Anemometer Winds

LI7700 CH4 and RSSI

Twitchell CH4

LI7500 CO2 and H2O

Twitchel Rice Flux Counts

Can't check TWSI_mixed
Can't check SIMBTWEE_met
1 TW_cam graphs found

TW Rice Autocam

Can't check TATWBABCSB_cam

 
 

Login
Select Notes:

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation and US Department of Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporters.