Skip to main content
rice field banner biometlab logo
   
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 

Field Notes

<--2001-01-03 09:00:00 | 2001-01-30 09:00:00-->
Other sites visited today: Vaira

Tonzi: 2001-01-05 09:00:00 (DOY 5)
Author: Dennis Baldocchi
Others:

Summary: Calibration of theta probes; issues with soil cores as A1 coefficient was too high (10).

The solar array is powering the Campbell data loggers. Two systems are running. One with four Tsoil probes and a pressure sensor. The other with 5 Theta probes.

The Theta probes were calibrated and buried

Probe ch

Sensor

Location

1

sn 31/085

20 cm, grass

2

sn 31/100

20 cm. Tree

3

sn 31/092

20 cm, grass

4

sn 31/016

25 cm, tree

5

sn 31/033

Surface

Calibration of theta probes. Took soil sample, damp and read it with all the sensors. There is some concern about how packed the sample is in how it affects the readings. Not sure how well we mimicked real field bulk density. The sensors were then buried.

Probe ch

Volt

dieletric constant (√ε1)

a1

1

0.4195

2.975

9.398

2

0.39348

2.884

8.813

3

0.4558

3.103

10.2

4

0.3998

2.906

8.956

5

0.3827

2.845

8.569

Wet sample: 425.96 g

Dry sample: 377.11 g

Vessel (w/o cap): 35.14 g

Volume of Vessel: 310 ml

Gravometric water content, (w-d)/d=0.1428

Volumetric water content (Θ0) = (w-d)/V=0.157

The dry values of √ε0 are reasonable and are in the range of 1.6 for mineral and 1.3 for organic soils.

Using data from Vaira for now,√ε0=1.5.

dieletric constant (√ε1) =1.07+6.4v-6.4v2+4.7v3=

Estimate of Bulk Density, d/V = (377.11-35.14)/260=1.315

Θ = (1.1 + 4.44V - a0) / a1 where
a0 = √ε0 and
a1 = (√ε1 - √ε0) / Θ0

The manual says the A1 coefficient is typically between 7.6 and 8.6, our numbers are closer to 10. Note sure if they are high because we may have artificially compacted the soil to put the samples into the vessel. Note the soil is very compacted and when we dig cores of soil, they come out as large distinct clods. Breaking them up produces large air spaces. If we compare the clods to remove the air spaces, then we may be compressing them more than how they were in the field. It is a tough sampling issue to obtain a representative value.

Field Data

No tank data

No TZ Well data found

No TZ Moisture Point data found

No VR Moisture Point data found

No TZ grass heigth found

No VR grass heigth found

Tree DBH

DateTag#Reading (mm)

No water potential data found

No TZ Grass Biomass data found

No TZ OakLeaves Biomass data found

No TZ PineNeedles Biomass data found

0 photos found

Graphs display:
16 sets found

No data found for TZ_Fenergy.
No data found for TZ_tmet.
No data found for TZ_soilco2.
Can't check TZ_mixed
3 TZ_mixed graphs found

Tonzi PPT

Tonzi CO2 and H2O Densities

Air Pressure

No data found for TZ_fflux.
No data found for TZ_fmet.
No data found for TZ_tram.
No data found for TZ_co2prof.
No data found for TZ_irt.
No data found for TZ_windprof.
No data found for TZ_tflux.
No data found for TZ_sm.
Can't check TZ_met
1 TZ_met graphs found

Floor and Tower RH

Can't check TZVR_mixed
No data found for TZ_osu.
No data found for TZ_fd.
Tonzi Z-cam data

plot of Tonzi z-cam LAI

plot of Tonzi z-cam gap fration

 
 

Login
Select Notes:

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation and US Department of Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the supporters.